Indecent Disclosure?

From the Digestive Disease Week, Chicago.

Walking around McCormick Place this week, one was struck by what was — and was not — in evidence, given all the hoo-ha over conflict of interest in medicine these days.  In the last few years, attendees were heaped up with purple-festooned items emblazoned with “Nexium“, the ubiquitous “Purple Pill” that is probably one of the most over-prescribed pharmaceuticals in America.  

Where have all the sponsors gone?/Photo by A. Ault

Where have all the sponsors gone?/Photo by A. Ault

But this year, there was a severe shortage of gee-gaws, both at the registration desk and in the exhibit hall.  I mean, not a single squeeze toy, pen or post-it note pad.  The official DDW bag was a chic black cotton number.  No drug company names, no embarassing slogans, just “DDW” and the cryptic acronyms for the four sponsoring professional societies.

Dianne Bach, DDW’s industry liaison, said the societies did not have any official new sponsorship policy, but that they had decided to follow the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America guidelines on industry support that went into effect in January.  That means that sponsorship of lanyards, carry bags, ID tags, pens, and the like were out.

DDW still had to offset that lost revenue, however.  The organization determined that drug company sponsorship of shuttle buses was OK.  And, for the first time, says Ms. Bach, DDW allowed large banners in the convention center hallways.

Purple banner/Photo by A. Ault

Purple banner/Photo by A. Ault

Still, DDW’s addressing of the conflict issue is a far cry from moves made by other professional societies. The American Psychiatric Association recently said it would no longer allow industry-supported symposia at its annual meeting.  DDW, however, has no plans to end those off-site seminars, says Ms. Bach.

And then there’s the matter of speaker disclosures.  DDW compiled a list of presenter disclosures, but don’t look for it in print.  The organization decided that at 180 pages, an on-line only version would be cheaper. 

At many sessions I attended — and i heard the same thing from a few other reporters — speakers only made glancing reference to their conflicts.

Now that’s what I’d call an indecent disclosure in this day and age. 

— Alicia Ault  (on Twitter @aliciaault)

1 Comment

Filed under Family Medicine, Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, Practice Trends

One response to “Indecent Disclosure?

  1. moodus

    would a tasteful, non-commercialized lanyard kill the societies? Must we throw the pill-popping baby out with the purple bathwater?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s