Treating Rheumatic Diseases: The Sooner the Better

from the annual scientific sessions of the American College of Rheumatology in Philadelphia

During the past 5 months, rheumatology societies issued substantively updated criteria for classifying two major rheumatic diseases. In June, the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) published new guidelines for classifying axial spondyloarthritis. And earlier this week, a collaborative group from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) unveiled their new revision of diagnostic criteria for rheumatoid arthritis during the ACR’s annual meeting. (A few days ago I posted a blog on this site about the new RA criteria). 

sacroilliac joints/image courtesy of NetMedicine

sacroiliac joints/image courtesy of NetMedicine

The parallels between the two actions are striking. Both sets of new criteria eliminated x-ray evidence of disease as a factor for patient identification. The thinking is that when patients develop joint damage that’s visible on x-rays it’s already too late; their disease has progressed to irreversible pathology. Both sets of new criteria allow identification of patients earlier in their disease course. And treatment options now exist that, when started at this earlier point, have a good chance of slowing or stopping further damage and  preventing patients from reaching an irreparable end stage.

Better medicine isn’t the only result. These new criteria have economic implications too, especially for spondyloarthritis.

For patients with early-stage rheumatoid arthritis, “I don’t get a lot of pushback from insurers” about paying for disease-modifying therapy, said Dr. Eric M. Ruderman, a Chicago rheumatologist, in an interview. “Most insurers see the value of disease modifying therapy, and they see a turn around in their costs after a year or 2.”

But, for spondyloarthritis, it’s different. Insurers “say show me the sacroiliac joint films,” a key part of the old criteria that was eliminated as a requirement in the June update, Dr. Ruderman said. “We have patients with clear, inflammatory spine disease who don’t meet the [old] New York criteria,” and fail treatment with the entry agent, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. “The new ASAS criteria take the x-ray out and give you other options” for treatment.

Will the new classification criteria ease insurance coverage for disease-modifying treatment of early-stage spondyloarthritis? “I hope it does,” Dr. Ruderman said when I spoke with him on Oct. 21. Right now, it’s still too soon to know for sure, he added.

You can read my coverage of the new ASAS spondyloarthritis criteria here.  Mycoverage of the new RA diagnostic criteria is here.

—Mitchel Zoler, 12:30 AM, Oct. 23, Wynnewood, PA (on Twitter @mitchelzoler)

Bookmark and Share

1 Comment

Filed under Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Rheumatology

One response to “Treating Rheumatic Diseases: The Sooner the Better

  1. le

    I agree, the sooner the better, ask for specialist, don’t just stay at your GP, they just gave you all the pain killer and said you just ok.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s