A Woman’s Right to … Refuse

From the National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference, Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights, Bethesda, Md.

The NIH panel that was charged with examining the reasons for the continuing downturn in vaginal birth after C-sections had a tough enough job in reaching a consensus today.  It was faced with a lack of evidence in many crucial areas, such as comparative outcomes for VBAC and elective repeat cesareans.

Photo by Alicia Ault

But the panel also had to contend with some thorny ethical and political  issues.  Thus, unlike many other such consensus panels, this expert committee faced an aggressively questioning audience that, at times, was downright hostile.

Why? Over the past two decades, many women have taken an increasingly activist role in the debate over where and how they will give birth.  With the growth of the Internet has come a concomitant increase in forums and Web sites devoted to pregnancy issues.  The rise in primary and repeat cesareans has been no secret.

The consensus statement found that some 30% of hospitals are now refusing to perform VBAC, which has become popularly known as “a VBAC ban.”  The National Organization for Women (NOW) passed a resolution in 2005 opposing institutional policies that essentially banned VBAC.  The NIH panel also confirmed that physicians increasingly prefer cesareans, partly because they harbor what the evidence shows is  an outsized fear of career-ending lawsuits.

While the panel’s consensus statements in those areas drew praise, more than a handful of nurses, midwives, gynecologists and advocates accused the panel of ignoring a woman’s right to choose, or more specifically, a woman’s right to refuse a cesarean.

Some said that the right had been established by legal precedent.

The panel’s ethicist, Laurence McCullough, Ph.D., of the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said that it was an extremely complicated issue that was outside the panel’s purview.  Other panel members noted the tension in the law that forced physicians to balance the mother’s life against that of the fetus.  Critics were not satisfied.

Should the medical establishment be leading the way on this informed consent issue? Or is this an issue that should be settled by the courts or the government?

— Alicia Ault (on Twitter @aliciaault)

Bookmark and Share


1 Comment

Filed under Family Medicine, IMNG, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Practice Trends

One response to “A Woman’s Right to … Refuse

  1. VBAC is a risky business for the mother, the fetus, the health professional, and the government! It is quite a hard decision for the mother and a conundrum for the health professional with this debate in full swing. With the rise in cesarean deliveries even in the developing countries, it is a question we ought to take a deeper look into. As for me, I support the mother’s decision following an informed consent.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s